Reduction of a malunited bilateral parasymphysis fracture using a Carrol-Girard screw: a case report

Article information

Arch Craniofac Surg. 2025;26(3):129-132
Publication date (electronic) : 2025 June 20
doi : https://doi.org/10.7181/acfs.2026.0006
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, SRM Dental College and Hospital, Chennai, India
Correspondence: Elavenil Panneerselvam, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, SRM Dental College and Hospital, Bharathi Salai, Ramapuram, Chennai 600089, India, E-mail: elavenilomfs@gmail.com
Received 2025 March 17; Revised 2025 May 13; Accepted 2025 June 19.

Abstract

Restoration of skeletal form and occlusion in bilateral parasymphysis fractures is technically demanding due to the fragmented mandible and the unfavorable muscular biodynamics. Accurate reduction is crucial for restoring the sagittal projection and transverse dimension of the anterior mandible. This case report describes a straightforward technique that facilitates precise anatomical reduction and stabilization during fixation of the central fragment using a Carroll-Girard screw.

INTRODUCTION

Reduction of bilateral parasymphysis fractures is challenging due to the following factors: fragmentation of the mandible into three segments and excessive muscular forces pulling the central fragment posteroinferiorly [1]. Proper reduction in such fractures is essential for restoring the sagittal projection and transverse dimension of the anterior mandible [2]. Here, we report a straightforward technique that aids in precise anatomical reduction and stabilization during fixation of the central fragment using a Carroll-Girard screw.

CASE REPORT

A 37-year-old man presented with pain and difficulty in mouth opening after falling from his bicycle 2 months ago. The patient expressed concerns regarding his severely retruded chin and loss of projection of the lower face. Clinical examination revealed bilateral step deformities in the parasymphysis region and tenderness over the left condylar region. Computed tomography imaging demonstrated a malunited bilateral parasymphysis fracture with an associated left subcondylar fracture (Fig. 1). Open reduction and internal fixation of the fractured segments were planned under general anesthesia to restore premorbid occlusion and function.

Fig. 1

Preoperative computed tomographic image of a 37-year-old man who presented with pain and difficulty in mouth opening following a self-reported fall from his bike 2 months earlier. The image shows a displaced bilateral parasymphysis fracture and a left subcondylar fracture in (A) frontal and (B) lateral views.

Reduction of the malunited bilateral parasymphysis fracture using Carroll-Girard screw

A vestibular incision was marked in the anterior mandibular region. Mucosa and mentalis muscle incision was made along with periosteal stripping to expose the fracture fragments. An osteotomy was performed along the lines of malunion using a surgical handpiece and a 703 bur. A Carroll-Girard screw (Ortho Max) was inserted into the bone of the central fragment (Fig. 2A). The handle was used to manipulate, reduce, and stabilize the central mandibular fragment (Fig. 2B). The Carroll-Girard screw was held with continuous anterior and superior traction until the fracture fragments were fixed using plates (Fig. 2C). Occlusion was simultaneously verified through intermaxillary fixation. The Carroll-Girard screw was subsequently removed after plate fixation.

Fig. 2

Intraoperative image showing placement of a Carroll-Girard screw into the central bone fragment in (A) frontal and (B) lateral views, as well as (C) accurate reduction and fixation of the bilateral parasymphysis fracture.

The concomitant left subcondylar fracture was reduced and fixed via a retro-mandibular approach. Layered closure of the vestibular and retro-mandibular incisions was performed using 4-0 absorbable sutures for the mucosa and subcutaneous tissue and 5-0 nylon sutures for the skin. Postoperatively, the patient demonstrated a good facial profile and stable occlusion (Fig. 3). No complications were observed during the follow-up period of 4 months.

Fig. 3

Postoperative computed tomographic image showing the reduction and fixation of fracture fragments in (A) frontal and (B) lateral views.

DISCUSSION

Restoration of skeletal form and occlusion in bilateral parasymphysis fractures is technically demanding due to the fragmented mandible and unfavorable muscular biodynamics [3]. Additionally, the complexities specific to this case included (1) malunion, preventing anatomical reduction by interdigitation of fracture fragments, and (2) absence of teeth in the anterior mandible, resulting in the loss of an occlusal guide for reduction.

Anatomic reduction of bilateral parasymphysis fractures is generally achieved using towel clips [4], bone forceps [5], wires [6], digital manipulation [7], or a combination of these methods [8]. However, these methods are associated with limitations. Towel clips and bone clamps engage only the buccal aspect, causing lingual splaying during reduction [9]. Digital manipulation is difficult due to excessive muscular forces [7]. Sargunam et al. [10] described the use of dental impression compound on the lingual aspect to prevent tipping of the mid-symphyseal fragment during fixation. Jaisani et al. [1] reported the reduction of bilateral parasymphysis fractures using a traction screw; however, this method can result in screw bending, and the screw handle is insufficiently ergonomic for applying traction in the desired plane. The use of a Carroll-Girard screw addresses these disadvantages by offering controlled traction in the correct direction and improving operator ergonomics by reducing wrist fatigue compared to other methods.

The Carroll-Girard screw was originally used for the reduction of zygomatic fractures in maxillofacial surgery [11,12]. Govind and Jelmini [13] have also reported the use of this instrument for reducing posteriorly displaced Markowitz type I fractures. This instrument features a wide horizontal handle and a T-bar screw, allowing rotation in any direction for precise manipulation of fracture fragments and anatomical reduction. The Carroll-Girard screw is simple to operate and maintains a three-dimensional force during fixation [11]. Though not conventionally used for reducing mandibular fractures, given the complexities associated with this particular fracture and the excessive pull of suprahyoid muscles, the Carroll-Girard screw was ideal for controlling and stabilizing the central fragment during fixation. It is straightforward and allows the application of traction force in the appropriate plane. In conclusion, the Carroll-Girard screw technique can effectively reduce and stabilize segmental mandibular fractures.

Notes

Conflict of interest

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Funding

None.

Ethical approval

The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of SRM Dental College and Hospital (SRMU/M&HS/SRMDC/ 2024/PG/024).

Patient consent

The patient provided written informed consent for the publication and use of his images.

Author contributions

Conceptualization: Elavenil Panneerselvam. Methodology: Trishala Annamalai Rajan. Project administration: Elavenil Panneerselvam. Writing - original draft: Trishala Annamalai Rajan, Elavenil Panneerselvam. Writing - review & editing: Trishala Annamalai Rajan, Elavenil Panneerselvam, Shri Krishna Prasanth Balasubramanian, Sasikala Balasubramanian, V. B. Krishna Kumar Raja. Investigation: Trishala Annamalai Rajan. Supervision; Validation: Elavenil Panneerselvam, V. B. Krishna Kumar Raja.

References

1. Jaisani MR, Pradhan L, Dongol A, Acharaya P, Sagtani A. Use of traction screw to aid in fracture reduction in bilateral parasymphysis fracture of mandible. Dent Traumatol 2016;32:251–3.
2. Shakya S, Zhang X, Liu L. Key points in surgical management of mandibular condylar fractures. Chin J Traumatol 2020;23:63–70.
3. Susarla SM, Swanson EW, Peacock ZS. Bilateral mandibular fractures. Eplasty 2014;14:ic38.
4. Rogers GF, Sargent LA. Modified towel-clamp technique to effect reduction of displaced mandible fractures. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000;105:695–7.
5. Tebbutt JE, Markose G, Graham RM. Self-retaining retractor and bone reduction forceps to manage a mandibular fracture. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2020;102:548–9.
6. Ingole PD, Rajguru JG, Budhraja NJ, Shenoi RS, Karmarkar JS, Dahake RN. ATOM technique: anatomic reduction using screw-wire traction for open reduction and internal fixation of mandibular fractures. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 2022;48:122–4.
7. Laurentjoye M, Majoufre-Lefebvre C, Caix P, Siberchicot F, Ricard AS. Treatment of mandibular fractures with Michelet technique: manual fracturereduction without arch bars. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009;67:2374–9.
8. Batbayar EO, van Minnen B, Bos RRM. Non-IMF mandibular fracture reduction techniques: a review of the literature. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2017;45:1327–32.
9. Batbayar EO, de Beij J, Bos RRM, van Minnen B. Development and feasibility of a new reduction forceps for mandibular fractures: a technical innovation. Adv Oral Maxillofac Surg 2021;4:100198.
10. Sargunam ED, Deepak C, Sivashanmugam SS, Madhumita R. Dental impression compound for mandibular bilateral parasymphysis fracture reduction. J Maxillofac Oral Surg 2021. Jan. 23. [Epub]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-020-01506-9 .
11. Choi BG, Kang CS, Kim YH, Chung KJ. A comparative analysis of outcomes after reduction of zygomatic fractures using the Carroll-Girard T-bar screw. Ann Plast Surg 2020;85:33–7.
12. Baek JE, Chung CM, Hong IP. Reduction of zygomatic fractures using the Carroll-Girard T-bar screw. Arch Plast Surg 2012;39:556–60.
13. Govind A, Jelmini J. An endonasal incision adds a second vector of manipulation during percutaneous reduction of fractures involving the frontonasal region. Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr 2021;14:162–6.

Article information Continued

Fig. 1

Preoperative computed tomographic image of a 37-year-old man who presented with pain and difficulty in mouth opening following a self-reported fall from his bike 2 months earlier. The image shows a displaced bilateral parasymphysis fracture and a left subcondylar fracture in (A) frontal and (B) lateral views.

Fig. 2

Intraoperative image showing placement of a Carroll-Girard screw into the central bone fragment in (A) frontal and (B) lateral views, as well as (C) accurate reduction and fixation of the bilateral parasymphysis fracture.

Fig. 3

Postoperative computed tomographic image showing the reduction and fixation of fracture fragments in (A) frontal and (B) lateral views.